loading

wirginia-voolf:

When you dive headfirst into female writing and emerge, months later, glowing and reborn, imbued with passion and depth and a profound love and empathy for all female experience ever, wanting to not read anything by male writers for a long time because it’s so very comfortable to have a female voice, besides your own, to carry with you all the time.

coffeeandmoorland:

image

I found a library that looks like it could be Oxford’s sister hidden right in my town. I practically started crying walking in. So much beauty and books.

end0skeletal:

Scotland in the Fall by Daniel Casson

briyarmara:

29.01.17

“Spend your free time the way you like, not the way you think you’re supposed to.”
― Susan Cain, Quiet

tenshichan1013:

finding nemo remake only in theaters december 21

turecepcja:

Kuri Huang, a freelance illustrator from NYC

mamapluto:

cephalopodvictorious:

emeritusprofessorofnothing:

benyw:

iloveradfems:

shopcatsca:

iloveradfems:

cecaeliawitch:

unapolpgeticalfeminist:

omg I’m doing research for one of projects for college, and apparently, girls learn better when they’re in an all girls class, but boys learn even worse when they’re in an all boys class, because all the negative things become even stronger of there are no girls to act as “buffer”

get rid of the boys and let girl learn in peace, i couldn’t care less about them

It’s not our job to be a “buffer”

Separate boys from girls then, they don’t have to be acting like mothers at age 12, if boys ruin the education of others boys, um, idk, fix their behavior maybe?

I work at uni. My program is very competitive. Like you need a 92% or more to get in. We get 10x the applications than we can accept. So. This means our program is 95% female. Simply because girls do better in highschool than boys. Its literally that simple. However. This is a HUGE deal in the administration! Because OMG all those poor boys with less than a 92% can’t get into our program and woe is me, those poor poor boys. Every year we meet to talk about ways to “rectify” this “problem”. One year they’re going to stop inviting me to these meetings. Because I always ask questions like “how do we get boys into the program with lower GPAs without denying girls with higher GPAs? And how is giving boys preferential treatment not sexist?” Keep going good ladies, I’m saving your seat!

This type of thing always happens when women are dominating something, protocols are changed to accommodate and benefit men, and if this strategy isn’t successful the field is devalued.

Keep the good work!

The amount of times I heard my grandfather talk about the ‘feminization’ of schools because he wanted to blame the system for boys under performing (or, more accurately: girls out performing the boys) instead of, ya know, boys’ entitled attitudes and overall piss poor behavior when at school.

When women fail at something: there must be something wrong with women
When women succeed at something: there must be something wrong with the system

I think I’ve talked about it before on other posts, but I once had an anthropology class that, completely unintentionally, was all women and one man, and he dropped the course after two weeks. The other section of the same anthropology class, taught by the same professor, was mixed with men and women. So, since it was anthropology, she asked if it was cool if she took notes. She said right away that the all female class had a wildly different vibe, that we spoke and acted differently and had different social expectations of her and the rest of the class, and that we let students complete their thoughts before disagreeing, while the mixed class was highly traditional and almost entirely male dominated because every time a woman spoke, a man jumped in halfway through to “correct” her by saying the same thing. Its a very small sample size, but I think about this a lot

So all those “girls shoulders and knees distract boys from learning” policies…..

booklover:

“I spread myself around: my whole little universe in crumbs; at the center, what?”

Roland Barthes, from Complete Works: 1942 - 1961; “Roland Barthes (via existential-celestial)

disorganisingmyself:

“When you believe without knowing you believe that you are damaged at your core, you also believe that you need to hide that damage for anyone to love you. You walk around ashamed of being yourself. You try hard to make up for the way you look, walk, feel. Decisions are agonizing because if you, the person who makes the decision, is damaged, then how can you trust what you decide? You doubt your own impulses so you become masterful at looking outside yourself for comfort. You become an expert at finding experts and programs, at striving and trying hard and then harder to change yourself, but this process only reaffirms what you already believe about yourself – that your needs and choices cannot be trusted, and left to your own devices you are out of control.”

— Geneen Roth, Women, Food and God
(via ourwakingsoules)

missbard:

BOOKS READ IN 2018: All Systems Red by Martha Wells

I could have become a mass murderer after I hacked my governor module, but then I realized I could access the combined feed of entertainment channels carried on the company satellites. It had been well over 35,000 hours or so since then, with still not much murdering, but probably, I don’t know, a little under 35,00 hours of movies, serials, books, plays, and music consumed. As a heartless killing machine, I was a terrible failure.

stylish-homes:
“Surprisingly cozy for such a grand view
”

stylish-homes:

Surprisingly cozy for such a grand view

via reddit

mienar:
“take a rest
”

mienar:

take a rest